微特电机 ›› 2019, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 24-27.

• 设计分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同永磁形状的内置式永磁电机空载性能比较

倪有源1,2,王  磊1   

  1. 1.合肥工业大学,合肥 230009; 2. 安徽大学 高节能电机及控制技术国家地方联合工程实验室,合肥 230601
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-15 出版日期:2019-08-28 发布日期:2019-08-23
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金项目(1508085ME89); 安徽大学高节能电机及控制技术国家地方联合工程实验室开放课题基金项目(KFKT201602)

No-Load Performance Comparison of Interior Permanent Magnet Motor with Different Magnet Shapes

NI You-yuan1,2, WANG Lei1   

  1. 1.Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009 China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory of Energy-Saving Motor & Control Technique, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2018-01-15 Online:2019-08-28 Published:2019-08-23

摘要: 运用二维有限元法计算了长方体和瓦形两种永磁形状的内置式永磁电机的空载性能。计算结果表明,在永磁用量和位置相同的情况下,瓦形永磁的空载气隙磁密和反电动势优于长方体永磁,但齿槽转矩大于长方体永磁。在保证永磁用量不变的情况下,分别改变永磁的位置和厚度,得到两种永磁形状下的空载气隙磁密、反电动势以及齿槽转矩的变化趋势,从而为内置式永磁电机的优化设计提供了理论参考。

关键词: 内置式永磁电机, 有限元法, 气隙磁密, 反电动势, 齿槽转矩

Abstract: Using two-dimensional finite element method, the no-load performance of interior permanent magnet motor with two different magnet shapes was analyzed. Under the equal volume and position of the magnets, the no-load air-gap flux density and back-electromotive force of the motor with the cuboid magnets are better than those with the tile magnets, but the cogging torque is higher. The no-load air-gap flux density, back-electromotive force and the cogging torque were obtained and compared for the motors with two magnet shapes in terms of the same volume and different positions and heights of the magnets. The presented results are helpful for the optimal design of interior permanent magnet motors.

中图分类号: